Verifiable
by design.
An Australian technology group building verifiable systems of record — cryptographic proof, event-sourced data, open standards.
- Product lines
- Five
- Public standards implemented
- 17
- Specifications published
- Two
- Built in
- Australia
Most business software asks you to trust what it reports.
Ours record what happened, then hand the party who has to rely on it a way to check the result themselves.
Cryptographic verification
Hash-chained, append-only records. On AllotX and AssetDNA the head is timestamped by an independent RFC 3161 authority, proven against a live public one — and where no authority is configured the surface says “pending” instead of claiming a timestamp.
Event-sourced by construction
The log is the source of truth and every view is derived from it, so the audit trail is not a feature someone remembered to add — it is the thing the product is made of.
Deterministic intelligence
Scores, confidences and projections are computed by rules that print their own working and refuse when the data is too thin. No model sits between your record and the number on the screen.
Open standards, not lock-in
GS1 EPCIS 2.0, GS1 Digital Link, Peppol UBL 2.1, JSON Schema 2020-12, OAuth 2.0, RFC 3161 — records leave in formats other systems already read.
Tenancy as a boundary
Per-tenant isolation, role-scoped access, AES-256-GCM on stored credentials, signed expiring embed tokens, hashed API keys, and an audit trail over access as well as change.
Portable by default
Full export at any time in a documented open format. On AssetDNA and EarthX the verification recipe ships with the export, so it stays checkable after you stop being a customer.
Public standards implemented across the family
- AES-256-GCM
- Australian Privacy Principle 12
- GHG Protocol Scope 1/2/3
- GS1 Digital Link
- GS1 EPCIS 2.0
- HMAC-SHA-256
- ISO 4217
- JSON Schema 2020-12
- JSON-LD
- JWS HS256
- OASIS UBL 2.1
- OAuth 2.0
- Peppol BIS Billing 3.0
- RFC 3161
- SDMX-CSV 2.1
- SHA-256
- W3C Web Push (RFC 8291/8292)
Implemented against the published specifications. No conformance certification is held or claimed.
Five product lines
How a record becomes checkable
Two of our specifications are public right now — AssetDNA’s export format and its inbound connector contract — and the connector ships an in-browser conformance validator you can run against your own feed before you ever contact us.
An AssetDNA record export is checkable offline with standard tooling in any language, so the verification does not depend on our systems, our company, or our continued existence.
TraceX emits supply-chain events and invoices in open external standards we do not control, so your records leave in formats other systems already read.
Independent third-party timestamping is claimed only where it is actually implemented: AllotX and AssetDNA. Every other platform keeps a tamper-evident record without that layer, and each page says so.
Four steps, four gates
What each gate is for01
See it
Open to anyone. No agreement, no account, no sales call.
02
Assess it
A mutual NDA — so we can answer specifics rather than generalities, and anything confidential you tell us is protected the same way.
03
Trial it on your data
An evaluation agreement: evaluation-only use, your data stays yours and leaves with you, and the tenancy expires on a fixed date.
04
Deploy it
A licence and an implementation plan with named owners and dates on both sides.
Vietnam – Australia Tech Connect Forum
10 August 2026 · University of Technology Sydney
Book a meeting at the forumPilot on your own data
A scoped, time-boxed evaluation tenancy on one product line, one building, one programme or one campaign. You keep everything you put in, and you keep everything that comes out.
Distribution, white-label and joint venture
Several of these platforms are designed to be run under someone else’s brand, or embedded inside a product that already has the customers. A local partner keeps the licence, the customer relationship and the market knowledge.
Research and standards collaboration
Grading how strongly a claim is evidenced is an open research question, not a solved one. We would rather argue about the grading ladder with a university than defend it alone.
Pick the conversation that fits.
See a demonstration
Any platform, on our demonstration data, with your questions driving it.
Request a demonstrationPropose a pilot
One product line, one building, one programme. Time-boxed, on your data.
Start a pilot conversationTake the overview
A printable, non-confidential overview to forward internally.
Open the overview